Can red light therapy increase muscle recovery and muscle mass? - Red Light Hero

Can red light therapy increase muscle recovery and muscle mass?

First published
Last reviewed
Reading time
5 min read

In short

Light applied around exercise can increase the muscle you gain from training and reduce the soreness and damage markers that follow it - the 2016 review that says so covered 46 trials, and the best results come from light applied before the work, in contact with the skin. Two well-run trials found nothing, so timing, dose and placement matter.

Helmut uses his panels before training and again afterwards for recovery.

Key takeaways

  1. The 2016 review by Ferraresi, Huang and Hamblin covered 46 trials in 1,045 people and concluded light around training can increase muscle gains and cut muscle-damage markers - enough that the authors asked whether sport should regulate it.Read this section: What the 2016 review actually says
  2. A 2023 review of 15 randomised trials found the most consistent results when light was applied before exercise, in contact with the skin, at 655-950nm.Read this section: Before training or after?
  3. In the identical-twin study, the twin who had 850nm LED after every session gained 20% thigh muscle volume against 5% - striking, but a study of two people.Read this section: The studies that stand out
  4. Two trials found nothing: a whole-body 660 and 850nm bed before and after heavy lifting, and an LED cluster after sprint sessions - timing, dose and placement all matter.Read this section: The null results
  5. Helmut uses his panels before training and again afterwards; the Dosage Estimator has a muscle preset for session times.Read this section: How we use it

Helmut uses his panels around training, so this question comes up a lot, and it deserves a proper answer rather than a slogan. The short version: there is a real body of trials, most of them small, the best results come from light applied before exercise, and two well-run studies found nothing at all. Here is what they say.

What the 2016 review actually says

The paper everyone quotes is a 2016 review by Ferraresi, Huang and Hamblin in the Journal of Biophotonics. It is a review, not a single study: the authors searched the literature up to 2016, kept 46 trials covering 1,045 participants, and sorted the light settings into those that improved muscle performance and recovery and those that did not. Their conclusion is the line on our research page: light around training "can increase muscle mass gained after training, and decrease inflammation and oxidative stress in muscle biopsies", to the point that they "raise the question of whether PBM should be permitted in athletic competition by international regulatory authorities". Those are the authors' words, and they are striking. They are also a summary of 46 mostly small trials, which is why the rest of this post is about the trials.

Before training or after?

Before, on the balance of the evidence. A 2023 review of 15 randomised trials concluded light therapy "has a positive effect on sports performance", most consistently when applied before exercise, in contact with the skin, at 655-950nm, with reduced muscle damage in five of seven strength studies. A 2021 narrative review of 25 human studies published since 2014 found protective and performance effects, again with pre-exercise use the common thread. The 2016 review calls this pre-conditioning: light delivered to the muscle before the work.

The studies that stand out

The one people remember is the identical twins. Two twin soccer players did the same 12-week strength programme; one had 850nm LED on the trained muscles after every session and the other a placebo. The LED twin gained 20% thigh muscle volume against 5%, improved leg-press strength 53% against 28%, had less soreness and smaller creatine kinase rises. It is a study of two people, so it is a demonstration rather than proof, but it is a clean one.

In 28 healthy men given 630nm red or 940nm near-infrared LED before a damaging plyometric workout, both wavelengths improved jump recovery over 72 hours, only the 940nm arm cut the creatine kinase rise, and pre-treating did not blunt the body's own "repeated bout" adaptation. In 40 people with exercise-induced soreness, 830nm LED raised pressure-pain thresholds at 48, 72 and 96 hours and improved range of motion, while swelling and strength were no different from placebo. And in 28 soccer players an 810nm five-diode cluster before eccentric exercise increased strength and lowered soreness and damage markers over 96 hours, with the lowest power setting working best - that one used lasers, and the authors of a separate review note that LED light can be as effective as laser, with similar biological effects.

The null results

Two trials deserve equal billing because they found nothing. Twelve trained men used a whole-body 660 and 850nm LED bed for 15 minutes before and after a heavy resistance workout, and creatine kinase over 72 hours and salivary IL-6 were no different from sham. In 36 healthy men, a 660-850nm LED cluster after sprint-interval sessions changed none of the inflammatory markers, soreness or jump performance, and matched cold-water immersion and active recovery. The bed study applied the light before and after the session, the cluster study afterwards. The fair summary is that the effect depends on timing, dose and where the light goes, and that whole-body beds at low settings have not shown what targeted, pre-exercise light has.

How we use it

Helmut uses his panels before the gym and again afterwards: the first session is the pre-conditioning the reviews describe, the second is for how he feels the next day. For session times, the Dosage Estimator has a "High-dose large muscle" preset based on the doses used in the research. For a specific muscle or joint, HeroBelt™ puts the light in contact with the skin, which is how most of the positive trials applied it; for legs and back together, a panel. The muscle recovery collection groups the devices, and the device finder will narrow it down.

What about the athletes?

Red light has reached professional sport. NBA star LeBron James has described using it for muscle and joint pain, and the San Francisco 49ers built a dedicated light therapy recovery room; the sources for each are on our Celebrities & Athletes page, which only lists what people have said publicly. An earlier version of this post named other athletes without a source; they are gone until we have one. The muscle research page has every study above and more, wavelength by wavelength.

References

Our sources for this article along with direct links and the reason we chose to cite it.

  1. Ferraresi, Huang and Hamblin (2016). Photobiomodulation in human muscle tissue: an advantage in sports performance? Journal of BiophotonicsWhy we cite it: The review quoted in the post: 46 trials, 1,045 participants, sorted by light settings that worked and did not. A narrative review by three photobiomodulation researchers, not a single trial; the quotes are the authors' own words.
  2. González-Muñoz et al. (2023). Effects of photobiomodulation in sports performance: a literature review. Applied SciencesWhy we cite it: The review of 15 randomised trials behind the "before exercise, in skin contact, 655-950nm" finding.
  3. Ailioaie and Litscher (2021). Photobiomodulation and sports: results of a narrative review. LifeWhy we cite it: The narrative review of 25 human studies since 2014; it covers the same ground from a second group.
  4. Ferraresi et al. (2016). Effects of light-emitting diode therapy on muscle hypertrophy, gene expression, performance, damage, and delayed-onset muscle soreness: case-control study with a pair of identical twins. American Journal of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationWhy we cite it: The identical-twin study: 850nm LED after every session over 12 weeks. Two people, so a demonstration rather than proof.
  5. Padoin et al. (2022). Phototherapy improves muscle recovery and does not impair repeated bout effect in plyometric exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchWhy we cite it: The 28-man randomised trial of 630nm and 940nm LED before plyometric exercise; the source for the repeated-bout finding.
  6. Chang et al. (2021). Effects of 830 nm light-emitting diode therapy on delayed-onset muscle soreness. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative MedicineWhy we cite it: The 40-person randomised trial behind the pressure-pain threshold figures; swelling and strength did not differ.
  7. de Oliveira et al. (2017). Pre-exercise infrared photobiomodulation therapy (810 nm) in skeletal muscle performance and postexercise recovery in humans: what is the optimal power output? Photomedicine and Laser SurgeryWhy we cite it: The soccer-player trial of an 810nm laser cluster before eccentric exercise; a laser study, cited for timing and the lowest-power result.
  8. Chaves et al. (2014). Effects of low-power light therapy on wound healing: LASER x LED. Anais Brasileiros de DermatologiaWhy we cite it: The review comparing lasers and LEDs; the source for the line that LED can be as effective as laser.
  9. Ghigiarelli et al. (2020). The effects of whole-body photobiomodulation light-bed therapy on creatine kinase and salivary interleukin-6 in a sample of trained males: a randomized, crossover study. Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingWhy we cite it: A null result: the whole-body 660 and 850nm bed before and after heavy lifting changed nothing.
  10. Malta et al. (2019). Photobiomodulation by LED does not alter muscle recovery indicators and presents similar outcomes to cold-water immersion and active recovery. Frontiers in PhysiologyWhy we cite it: A null result: a 660-850nm LED cluster after sprint sessions matched ice baths and active recovery.

About the author

Helmut Uhlmann

Helmut Uhlmann

Founder, Red Light Hero

Helmut Uhlmann founded Red Light Hero and writes this blog. He delves deep into the research and is passionate about helping people get the most out of red light therapy.

Our story

Speak to us

Questions about this article, or about which device fits what you want to do? Email us or leave a comment. Advice is complimentary and there is no obligation to buy anything.

Disclaimer

Red Light Hero devices use clinical-grade LEDs but are not included in the ARTG and are not intended to treat or prevent disease. The research discussed here is about the wavelengths and technologies we use, not about our products. This article is educational information only, not medical advice - check with your healthcare professional before use, particularly if you are pregnant, take medication that increases light sensitivity, or have a condition affecting your eyes or skin.

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.

Back to blog