Competitor Comparison
We've done the research³
We provide guidance
Hero300 Comparison Table
Feature | Hero300 | Joovv Solo 3.0 | Infraredi Pro Max | MitoPRO 1500+ | InfraHeal Max | Lumitter Pro | Platinum LED BIOMAX | Aus Red Light Ultra | TLA Pro II 1500 | Urban Hippee ProPlus | Rojo Refine900 | Block Blue Light Mega |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price (AUD) | $1399 | $2380 | $1499 | $1768 | $1449 | $1349 | $2000 | $1799 | $1996 | $1299 | $1995 | $2349 |
Floor stand cost | $62 | Included | $150 | $211 | $49 | $100 | $211 | Not available | $254 | $250 | Included | $189 |
LEDs | 300 | 150 | 300 (150 dual lens) | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 240 | 300 | 300 |
Irradiance at 6"/15cm | 172mw/cm2 | Not specified | 163mw/cm2 | >170mw/cm2 | 172mw/cm2 | 163mw/cm2 | 185mw/cm2 | >120mw/cm2 | 135mw/cm2 | <165mw/cm2 | 185mw/cm2 | 167mw/cm2 |
Wavelengths | 5 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
630nm | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
660nm | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
810nm | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
830nm | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
850nm | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Beam angle | 30 degrees | Not specified | Not specified | 60 degrees | 30 degrees | Not specified | Not specified | 60 degrees | 60 degrees | 60 degrees | 60 degrees | 60 degrees |
Input power | 273W | 212W | Not specified | 400W | 455W | Not specified | 380W | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | 483W | 580W |
EMF at 3"/7.5cm | 0 | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | 0 | 0 | 0 at 4" | 0 at 4" | Not specified | 0 | 0.8mG | 0 |
Flicker-free | ✅ | Not specified | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Not specified | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Pulsing | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | Not specified | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
NIR + R control | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Not specified | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Timer | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Not specified | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Brightness | Fixed at maximum | Adjustable | Adjustable | Adjustable | Not specified | Adjustable | Adjustable | Not specified | Not specified | Adjustable | Adjustable | Adjustable |
App | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
Remote control | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Not specified | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
Warranty | 2 years | 2 years | 3 years | 3 years | 2 years | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years | 30 days | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years |
Free shipping | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | US only | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
Returns policy | 60 days | 60 days | 60 days | 60 days | 30 days | 30 days | 60 days | No returns | No returns | 30 days | 60 days | 30 days |
Rated lifespan | 100,000 hours | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | 100,000 hours | 50,000 hours | 100,000 hours | Not specified | 100,000 hours | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified |
Product link | View product | View product | View product | View product | View product | View product | View product | View product | View product | View product | View product | View product |
Notes | The best value red light therapy panel | Site says irradiance is >100mw/cm2, but measurement distance is not provided. Extremely low power consumption of 212W implies low irradiance | Site only provides Irradiance at 0", which is 250mw/cm2. However this is not a practical distance and would mean exposure to large amounts of EMF - irradiance and EMF both dissipate quickly with distance. After emailing them to clarify, we learned the irradiance at 6" is 163mw/cm2 | >170 could mean 170.5; be weary of anything left vague, there's often a reason | The closest in specifications to the Hero300, but uses more electricity and is more expensive | Can deduce lower output power from lower irradiance | Additional 2 wavelengths are 480nm (blue) and 1060nm (near infrared); blue light damages skin, disturbs sleep and in our opinion we get enough of it from screens. Wavelengths around 1000nm and above can pose a risk to eyes. This is one of only 2 panels we found with higher irradiance measurements, but having experienced the intensity of the Hero300 we do not believe this slight increase in power is worth spending around double the money per panel (two Hero300's would have higher combined irradiance and double the coverage!) | Site says irradiance is >120mw/cm2 without referencing a measurement distance | Site says the panel is "EMF free at minimum usable distances". 645nm is the additional wavelength, which we see as being exceptionally close to 630nm and 660nm and not worth the substantially higher cost or poorer irradiance | Doesn't specify irradiance at 6", but says irradiance at 3" is 165mw/cm2 so it must be less than that at 6" | It's unclear whether their irradiance rating is legitimate because they have a disclaimer under it saying "this measurement is for competitor comparison purposes only and shouldn't be used for dosing purposes". Having experienced the intensity of the Hero300, even if it was legitimate it wouldn't be worth the extra cost or electricity usage (it's power consumption is 200W higher than the Hero300!). It also has measurable EMF at 3" while the Hero300 does not | Extremely expensive and very energy inefficient - 580W power consumption for only 167mw/cm2 at 6". |